![]() |
Music Reviews |
Why am I doing this? Well, much of this stuff is hard to get hold of, is not reviewed in the mainframe press, or takes a while to appreciate. So I'm kind of thinking that perhaps people searching for info on one album may find these pages.
I've never been a professional music reviewer, (sounds like a nice job though, and I am open to offers!), so these are very much personal opinions. You may hate stuff I love, or alternately love stuff I loathe.
What should an effective review try and cover? Well, the key things the reader wants to know are typically 'Will I like it?' and maybe 'Should I buy it?'. Potential listeners are likely to fall into one of a few groups too, which may help focus.
In general you will probably notice a distinct slant towards positive reviews. That is because I really think its not that useful to slag something off, unless a warning is required. So if I hear a musician I don't much like, I tend to ignore them rather than go out of my way to slag them off. (See 'Top ten rap and hop-hop').
I am not really interested in the instruments - despite having 2 synths myself, this is about music, not instruments.
The key references for me are:
See my pages here on 'A personal history of electronic music' for a more detailed view of this, also for some recommended listening.
Marks. Well, what does ten mean? What does one mean? Or perhaps more usefully, what does 5 mean? I intend to be very mean with 9's and 10's, either would indicate something completely definitive for it's genre, with 10 having very wide appeal too.
I won't review much below 5, for reasons stated above, (though I have plenty of pooh that deserves such marks!). I would consider 7 or 8 to be pretty good marks - let's put it like this, if I give something 7 or 8, I'll be looking for more by that artist. Below this the album is probably inconsistent with a mix of good and bad stuff, or something disappointing by someone we know is capable of better.
All highly subjective!